Payday - Pharmaceutical Representative
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009
Search

Payday
The way physicians are compensated can influence prescribing


Pharmaceutical Representative

Top-performing pharmaceutical and biotech sales representatives generally do well because they know how to tap into physician needs and shape their presentations accordingly. Typically, needs-based discussions focus on specific product-related issues such as efficacy, safety and convenience.

But physicians have another set of needs, too, and they relate to money. Very often, physician compensation methods influence practice methods, including how and when they prescribe certain medications. When you understand how physicians are paid, you can fine-tune your messages to help address physician needs while ensuring appropriate utilization of your products.

Three major categories

Current physician compensation models are highly variable and continue to evolve, but they generally fall into three basic categories:

* Fee-for-service (FFS).
* Capitation.
* Salary.

Fee-for-service. Under the FFS model, a physician sets a specific charge for each service he provides. Charges are listed on a fee schedule, which is a comprehensive, line-item list of services provided along with a dollar amount for each service.

Fee schedules are usually based on a set of billing codes derived from the Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), a system of the Chicago-based American Medical Association that assigns a unique five-digit code to each medical procedure or service performed by physicians.

Under an unrestricted FFS model, there is a direct relationship between performing a service and receiving a payment. Physicians are incentivized to perform as many services as possible in order to generate maximum revenue; the more services a physician provides, the more he earns.

Fee-for-service remains a very common method of compensation, even in a time of restrictive managed care contracts. Traditional indemnity insurance companies use FFS to compensate physicians, as do many Blue Cross Blue Shield companies, Medicare parts A and B, most state workers' compensation programs, and many managed care payers (health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations).

Fee-for-service physicians who participate in HMOs and PPOs often agree to provide discounts off their regular fee schedules in return for the guaranteed patient flow provided by the plans.

Plans may also use a withholding system that forces physicians to assume some degree of risk. A "withhold" is a percentage of a physician's monthly fee that the plan retains and places in a "risk pool." The plan tracks physician costs and, if necessary, uses the withheld funds to pay for cost overruns related to specialist and hospital referrals and possibly prescription drug costs. If the health plan is profitable and the physicians meet productivity measures, the plan pays the withheld amounts back to the physicians at the end of the year.

Capitation. Capitation fees are prepayments to a physician practice for each health plan member assigned to the practice. Capitation payments are usually calculated on a per-patient-per-month (PMPM) basis, and in return for the fees, physicians agree to deliver a specified set of healthcare services.

Under this model, physicians must manage services and related costs within the totals specified in a capitation contract. Capitation allows health plans to forecast healthcare costs more accurately and to hold providers at risk for the utilization and cost of services.

Healthy plan members are a great benefit for capitated physicians, because healthy individuals require few, if any, physician services. This means fewer expenses for physicians and a higher percentage of income that can be retained for office expenses and profit.

As is the case with FFS, some capitation contracts may include risk pool/withholding clauses to motivate physicians to closely manage expenses. Some contracts capitate for pharmacy costs, too, an issue that we will revisit later in this article.

Salary. Salaries are fixed, contracted annual income arrangements between physicians and employers. In managed care, salaried physicians usually work in staff-model HMOs and plan-run medical centers. (Academic hospitals and some physician groups also pay physicians via salary.) Salary contracts define physician compensation rates, as well as expected performance and productivity levels.

Salaried physicians typically work in highly structured, restrictive environments. Their employers must manage costs effectively and generally demand that physicians "follow the rules." These rules relate to drug utilization review, tiered formularies, prior authorization and prescribing guidelines, such as step therapy and clinical algorithms.

Physicians who prefer the security of a guaranteed paycheck and don't want to deal with practice management issues and risk pool targets often prefer positions with salary arrangements.

Beyond basics: Incentives and productivity

Those are the basics. In the real world, individual physicians' compensation packages rarely fit neatly into any of the three buckets just described. With increased pressure from payers to keep costs in check, incentives and productivity often come into play.

Incentives. In these arrangements, physicians are paid a base component (usually a salary) while earning additional compensation related to specific performance measures. In most situations, these measures include some combination of the following factors:

* Revenue produced.
* Quality standards (such as the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, patient satisfaction and peer reviews).
* Administrative/leadership responsibilities (such as marketing and staff management).
* Teaching and mentoring (training of new physicians, physician's assistants and nurses).
* Utilization of services (such as hospital services, ancillary care and specialty referrals).
* Cost-effectiveness (in terms of staffing, supplies, etc.).

Typically, incentives are based on a percentage of the base amount (20%, for example). Well-designed incentive agreements offer the security of a guaranteed income while motivating physicians to be attentive to the bottom line.

It's important to note that shared rebates may function as a physician incentive. Health plans negotiate rebate arrangements directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers or through pharmacy benefit managers. Rebates may be based on market share incentives, so the plan -- through a tiered formulary -- may encourage physicians to use certain products to generate larger rebates. In some cases, physician groups may receive a share of the rebate.

Productivity. In a productivity-driven arrangement, physician compensation correlates directly to the volume of patients treated or services performed. Physician productivity can be measured through any combination of factors, including net revenues produced for the practice, patient encounters, hours worked or relative value scales.

Typically, productivity-based arrangements attract physicians who are willing to assume significant financial risk and take on increased professional responsibilities in return for a higher income than might be available in straight-salaried positions.

Compensation, risk and pharma sales

What's the connection between physician compensation and pharmaceutical sales?

The relationship could be significant, depending upon:

* The physician's compensation model and incentives.
* The physician's prescribing habits.
* The degree to which the physician conforms to health plan prescribing directives.
* The level of financial risk that the physician is exposed to.
* The cost of your product (relative to the cost of alternative medications, including generics and over-the-counter drugs).
* Shared rebate arrangements.

Any combination of these factors could influence how physicians perceive your product and how they will respond to your messages. For this reason, it is imperative that you understand the financial factors that shape physicians' prescription drug choices. This is especially so when you consider situations in which physicians are at risk for pharmacy costs.

For example, with a pharmacy risk pool (or withhold) in effect, a practice has a targeted annual budget for total prescription drug expenses. If the practice exceeds the target figure, the health plan retains the risk pool funds and applies the money to the overspend. If pharmacy costs come in under the target, the extra funds are returned to the practice as an end-of-year "bonus."

In capitation contracts, physician groups may accept responsibility for all or a portion of pharmacy expenses for a per-member-per-month fee. If prescription costs exceed the total PMPM amount, the physicians lose money; if drug costs are less than the PMPM target, the practice keeps the difference.

Whatever the case, it is very often in the physician's best economic interest to prescribe less expensive medications.

Your advance knowledge of a physician's compensation method gives you a heads-up on every sales call. The most impressive efficacy and safety data in the world may be of little interest to physicians if they stand to lose money when prescribing your product.

Thus, if economics are an issue, it will be helpful to craft a message that highlights your product's ability to enhance patient care and save money in the long term. For example, successful treatment with the product might help reduce repeat office visits and cut down on the need for hospital or specialty care. Of course, you will require solid data to support your claims.

Best resource: The account manager

How do you find out what financial factors drive a physician's prescribing behavior?

You can always ask key physicians you have developed relationships with, who may be willing to explain the basic mechanics of their capitation and risk pool arrangements.

However, the best resources are your company's national and regional account managers, who service the health plans that contract with physicians in your territory. When negotiating contracts, managers may learn how a plan's physicians are incentivized to prescribe your company's product.

Your awareness of how compensation and incentives influence physician prescribing will make it easier for you to match your messages to physicians' underlying needs. The result: more solid relationships with your customers and enhanced sales performance in the months and years ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT

Survey
The more people talk about healthcare reform the less consensus there is, what do you think of current efforts to reform the system?
Healthcare reform is
Good for pharma
Bad for pharma
Doomed to failure
An idea whose time has come
Good for pharma
18%
Bad for pharma
37%
Doomed to failure
24%
An idea whose time has come
21%
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENTS
Source: Pharmaceutical Representative,
Click here