Top-performing
pharmaceutical and biotech sales representatives generally do well
because they know how to tap into physician needs and shape their
presentations accordingly. Typically, needs-based discussions focus on
specific product-related issues such as efficacy, safety and
convenience.
But physicians have another set of needs, too, and they relate to
money. Very often, physician compensation methods influence practice
methods, including how and when they prescribe certain medications.
When you understand how physicians are paid, you can fine-tune your
messages to help address physician needs while ensuring appropriate
utilization of your products.
Three major categories
Current physician compensation models are highly variable and continue
to evolve, but they generally fall into three basic categories:
* Fee-for-service (FFS).
* Capitation.
* Salary.
Fee-for-service. Under the FFS
model, a physician sets a specific charge for each service he provides.
Charges are listed on a fee schedule, which is a comprehensive,
line-item list of services provided along with a dollar amount for each
service.
Fee schedules are usually based on a set of billing codes derived from
the Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), a system of the
Chicago-based American Medical Association that assigns a unique
five-digit code to each medical procedure or service performed by
physicians.
Under an unrestricted FFS model, there is a direct relationship between
performing a service and receiving a payment. Physicians are
incentivized to perform as many services as possible in order to
generate maximum revenue; the more services a physician provides, the
more he earns.
Fee-for-service remains a very common method of compensation, even in a
time of restrictive managed care contracts. Traditional indemnity
insurance companies use FFS to compensate physicians, as do many Blue
Cross Blue Shield companies, Medicare parts A and B, most state
workers' compensation programs, and many managed care payers (health
maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations).
Fee-for-service physicians who participate in HMOs and PPOs often agree
to provide discounts off their regular fee schedules in return for the
guaranteed patient flow provided by the plans.
Plans may also use a withholding system that forces physicians to
assume some degree of risk. A "withhold" is a percentage of a
physician's monthly fee that the plan retains and places in a "risk
pool." The plan tracks physician costs and, if necessary, uses the
withheld funds to pay for cost overruns related to specialist and
hospital referrals and possibly prescription drug costs. If the health
plan is profitable and the physicians meet productivity measures, the
plan pays the withheld amounts back to the physicians at the end of the
year.
Capitation. Capitation fees
are prepayments to a physician practice for each health plan member
assigned to the practice. Capitation payments are usually calculated on
a per-patient-per-month (PMPM) basis, and in return for the fees,
physicians agree to deliver a specified set of healthcare services.
Under this model, physicians must manage services and related costs
within the totals specified in a capitation contract. Capitation allows
health plans to forecast healthcare costs more accurately and to hold
providers at risk for the utilization and cost of services.
Healthy plan members are a great benefit for capitated physicians,
because healthy individuals require few, if any, physician services.
This means fewer expenses for physicians and a higher percentage of
income that can be retained for office expenses and profit.
As is the case with FFS, some capitation contracts may include risk
pool/withholding clauses to motivate physicians to closely manage
expenses. Some contracts capitate for pharmacy costs, too, an issue
that we will revisit later in this article.
Salary. Salaries are fixed,
contracted annual income arrangements between physicians and employers.
In managed care, salaried physicians usually work in staff-model HMOs
and plan-run medical centers. (Academic hospitals and some physician
groups also pay physicians via salary.) Salary contracts define
physician compensation rates, as well as expected performance and
productivity levels.
Salaried physicians typically work in highly structured, restrictive
environments. Their employers must manage costs effectively and
generally demand that physicians "follow the rules." These rules relate
to drug utilization review, tiered formularies, prior authorization and
prescribing guidelines, such as step therapy and clinical algorithms.
Physicians who prefer the security of a guaranteed paycheck and don't
want to deal with practice management issues and risk pool targets
often prefer positions with salary arrangements.
Beyond basics: Incentives and
productivity
Those are the basics. In the real world, individual physicians'
compensation packages rarely fit neatly into any of the three buckets
just described. With increased pressure from payers to keep costs in
check, incentives and productivity often come into play.
Incentives. In these
arrangements, physicians are paid a base component (usually a salary)
while earning additional compensation related to specific performance
measures. In most situations, these measures include some combination
of the following factors:
* Revenue produced.
* Quality standards (such as the Health Plan Employer Data and
Information Set, patient satisfaction and peer reviews).
* Administrative/leadership responsibilities (such as marketing and
staff management).
* Teaching and mentoring (training of new physicians, physician's
assistants and nurses).
* Utilization of services (such as hospital services, ancillary care
and specialty referrals).
* Cost-effectiveness (in terms of staffing, supplies, etc.).
Typically, incentives are based on a percentage of the base amount
(20%, for example). Well-designed incentive agreements offer the
security of a guaranteed income while motivating physicians to be
attentive to the bottom line.
It's important to note that shared rebates may function as a physician
incentive. Health plans negotiate rebate arrangements directly with
pharmaceutical manufacturers or through pharmacy benefit managers.
Rebates may be based on market share incentives, so the plan -- through
a tiered formulary -- may encourage physicians to use certain products
to generate larger rebates. In some cases, physician groups may receive
a share of the rebate.
Productivity. In a
productivity-driven arrangement, physician compensation correlates
directly to the volume of patients treated or services performed.
Physician productivity can be measured through any combination of
factors, including net revenues produced for the practice, patient
encounters, hours worked or relative value scales.
Typically, productivity-based arrangements attract physicians who are
willing to assume significant financial risk and take on increased
professional responsibilities in return for a higher income than might
be available in straight-salaried positions.
Compensation, risk and pharma sales
What's the connection between physician compensation and pharmaceutical
sales?
The relationship could be significant, depending upon:
* The physician's compensation model and incentives.
* The physician's prescribing habits.
* The degree to which the physician conforms to health plan prescribing
directives.
* The level of financial risk that the physician is exposed to.
* The cost of your product (relative to the cost of alternative
medications, including generics and over-the-counter drugs).
* Shared rebate arrangements.
Any combination of these factors could influence how physicians
perceive your product and how they will respond to your messages. For
this reason, it is imperative that you understand the financial factors
that shape physicians' prescription drug choices. This is especially so
when you consider situations in which physicians are at risk for
pharmacy costs.
For example, with a pharmacy risk pool (or withhold) in effect, a
practice has a targeted annual budget for total prescription drug
expenses. If the practice exceeds the target figure, the health plan
retains the risk pool funds and applies the money to the overspend. If
pharmacy costs come in under the target, the extra funds are returned
to the practice as an end-of-year "bonus."
In capitation contracts, physician groups may accept responsibility for
all or a portion of pharmacy expenses for a per-member-per-month fee.
If prescription costs exceed the total PMPM amount, the physicians lose
money; if drug costs are less than the PMPM target, the practice keeps
the difference.
Whatever the case, it is very often in the physician's best economic
interest to prescribe less expensive medications.
Your advance knowledge of a physician's compensation method gives you a
heads-up on every sales call. The most impressive efficacy and safety
data in the world may be of little interest to physicians if they stand
to lose money when prescribing your product.
Thus, if economics are an issue, it will be helpful to craft a message
that highlights your product's ability to enhance patient care and save
money in the long term. For example, successful treatment with the
product might help reduce repeat office visits and cut down on the need
for hospital or specialty care. Of course, you will require solid data
to support your claims.
Best resource: The account manager
How do you find out what financial factors drive a physician's
prescribing behavior?
You can always ask key physicians you have developed relationships
with, who may be willing to explain the basic mechanics of their
capitation and risk pool arrangements.
However, the best resources are your company's national and regional
account managers, who service the health plans that contract with
physicians in your territory. When negotiating contracts, managers may
learn how a plan's physicians are incentivized to prescribe your
company's product.
Your awareness of how compensation and incentives influence physician
prescribing will make it easier for you to match your messages to
physicians' underlying needs. The result: more solid relationships with
your customers and enhanced sales performance in the months and years
ahead.
Christian Pinsonault is a managing partner at Flanders, NJ-based Pinsonault Associates LLC, a managed care training and information company for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The company recently launched a new CD-ROM program for representatives entitled Medicare: Changing the Face of Healthcare. He can be reached at (800) 372-9009 or by e-mail at christian@pinsonault.com.
Articles by Christian Pinsonault
Tony Pinsonault is a managing partner at Flanders, NJ-based Pinsonault Associates L.L.C., a managed care training and information company for the pharmaceutical industry. He can be reached at (800) 372-9009 or by e-mail at tony@pinsonault.com.
Articles by Tony Pinsonault
ADVERTISEMENT
Survey
The more people talk about healthcare reform the less consensus there is, what do you think of current efforts to reform the system?
Healthcare reform is
Good for pharma
18%
Bad for pharma
37%
Doomed to failure
24%
An idea whose time has come
21%
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENTS
Source: Pharmaceutical Representative,
3/1/2006 Click here