RepReview 2007 - Pharmaceutical Representative
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009
Search

RepReview 2007


Pharmaceutical Representative


Hard-earned by the worthy


Figure 3
Quality time is hard to come by, and RepReview respondents overwhelmingly point the finger at "too many competitive representatives taking up physicians' time" as the culprit of the access problem (see Figure 3).

But it's not the only obstacle. Seventy-seven percent of respondents said they think public opinion of pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturers has declined in the past year. Of those who sense this change, 32% attributed it to bad publicity and media coverage.

The cost of medication was cited by one in five (22%). This is a result of the skyrocketing price tag for drug development and the consequence of a reduced pipeline and life cycle for true blockbuster products. Drug costs are also affected by the financial burden of supporting and sustaining a large sales force, which requires marketing, training, compensation, speaker programs and more.


Figure 4
As if that isn't enough, industry regulations — including PhRMA codes and AMA restrictions, for some — as well as managed-care prescribing parameters, information restrictions, overextended physicians, closed-door practices and other factors are also limiting reps' ability to develop critical relationships with prescribers. Managers also cite decreases in physician reimbursement and new productivity requirements for physicians as barriers (See Figure 4).

So how can the pharma sales force even begin to overcome these challenges? Nearly half (45%) of all respondents cite "making effective use of physicians' time" as the one-most-important factor for getting more time. Yet reps say they currently provide new information to physicians in only about 42% of their sales calls. Clearly, there's a disconnect between what reps want to do and what they're able to do given the current restraints on them.

Adding value for physicians can be particularly cumbersome if a rep's lead brand is mature — it has no new data and often no new indications on the horizon. It's tough to succeed when there's nothing new to say about a brand and the physician decides on whether or not to see the rep again partly based on how efficiently he or she uses the time.

Harsh realities

Together, these factors have dramatically changed the selling game in the industry. Reps no longer have enough face time with physicians to deliver the full-message detail — even though reps say that marketing provides useful materials and that they do a good job at rolling out viable campaigns. Respondents estimate that they get enough time to adequately detail a physician in just 16-17% of their calls. This makes it very difficult for a sales rep to impact prescription decisions.


Figure 5
And the reality is that too many reps are functioning as sample suppliers. Despite the usefulness of the sales tools available to them, reps and managers agree that samples are the single-most-important selling resource (see Figure 5).

Overall, respondents estimate that only half of the physicians on their call list would still see them if they had no samples to give. Predictably, sample suppliers estimated a far smaller no-sample audience (only 39%) than trusted colleagues (59%).


ADVERTISEMENT

Survey
The more people talk about healthcare reform the less consensus there is, what do you think of current efforts to reform the system?
Healthcare reform is
Good for pharma
Bad for pharma
Doomed to failure
An idea whose time has come
Good for pharma
18%
Bad for pharma
37%
Doomed to failure
24%
An idea whose time has come
21%
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENTS
Source: Pharmaceutical Representative,
Click here